Vishal Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.3610 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-927 Year-2020 Thana- MADHEPURA District- Madhepura ====================================================== VISHAL KUMAR SON OF LATE PREM YADAV R/O- NAYA TOLA WARD NO.-1, JORABGANJ, P.S.- KODHA, DISTRICT- KATIHAR ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Shivam, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Satya Nand Shukla, A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 26-05-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

Let the defect(s), if any, be removed within a period of four weeks after complete start of the physical Court. The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 379 and 356 of the Indian Penal Code.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody since 07.08.2021, charge-sheet has been submitted and has antecedent of fourteen cases. Learned counsel submits that the petitioner was arrested in Saharsa P.S. Case No. 63 of 2021 and, thereafter, he was remanded in all the other thirteen cases which were against unknown and, thus, antecedent of fourteen cases was created.

The informant alleges that he was intercepted by two unknown criminals who snatched his bag containing Rs.50,000/-

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.3610 of 2022(2) dt.26-05-2022 2/2 along with other articles as detailed in the FIR. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that FIR was against unknown and petitioner was arrested in Saharsa P.S. Case No. 63 of 2021 wherein one accused Rauki Yadav confessed his participation in the present occurrence along with the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that despite petitioner being in custody, he was not put on T.I. Parade nor any incriminating article was recovered from his possession connecting him with the offence.

Learned A.P.P. for the State vehemently opposes the prayer for regular bail of the petitioner.

Considering the fact that the petitioner is in custody since 07.08.2021, charge-sheet has been submitted, was not put on T.I. Parade nor any incriminating article was recovered from the possession of the petitioner and it was only after his arrest in Saharsa P.S. Case No. 63 of 2021, petitioner came to be implicated in 13 other cases, the petitioner, above named, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty-five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court below where the case is pending in connection with Madhepura P.S. Case No. 927 of 2020. (Satyavrat Verma, J) Kundan/- U T