← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./4426/2023dismissed

Mukti Nath Paswan v. The State Of Bihar

2023-04-06Mr. Justice Anjani Kumar Sharan2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.4426 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-343 Year-2021 Thana- GOVERNMENT OFFICIAL COMP. District- Muzaffarpur ====================================================== MUKTI NATH PASWAN Son of Kantu Paswan Resident of Ward No.-12, Turki, P.S.- Kudhani, District- Muzaffarpur ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Sanjay Kumar @ S.K., Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Binod Kumar, APP.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 06-04-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 30(a), 30(c) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016 (Amendment Act 2018).

Allegedly, 5 litres of illicit liquor as well as 90 litres of fermented mixed material was recovered near the house of the petitioner.

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner is quite innocent and has committed no offence. No incriminating article has been recovered from the conscious physical possession or house of the petitioner rather illicit liquor

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.4426 of 2023(2) dt.06-04-2023 2/2 is said to have been recovered from the open place. Petitioner has no concern either with the seized liquor or the place of recovery or any trade of liquor. The allegation levelled against the petitioner is not specific rather general and omnibus in nature. Petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case at the instance of his enemy. He was not apprehended on the spot. He had not consumed liquor. There is nothing on record to indicate the complicity of the petitioner. Petitioner has no criminal antecedent as mentioned in para-3 of this application. Learned APP for the State opposed the prayer for bail. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, as there is recovery of illicit liquor near the house of the petitioner, I am not inclined to enlarge him on anticipatory bail. The prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is hereby rejected.

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) divyanshi/- U T