← Library
Patna High CourtCR. REV./191/2021dismissed

Abdul Momin v. The State Of Bihar

2025-06-27Mr. Justice Jitendra Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL REVISION No.191 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.- Year-0 Thana- District- Jamui ====================================================== Abdul Momin Son of Abbas Resident of Village - Harna, P.S. Jhajha, District - Jamui.

... ... Petitioner

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

Zarina Khatoon W/o Abdul Momin Resident of Village - Harna, P.S. Jhajha, District - Jamui.

... ... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr. Abdul Mannan Khan, Advocate Mr. Binay Kumar, Advocate For the State :

Mr. Chandra Sen Prasad Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA KUMAR ORAL ORDER 27-06-2025 I.A. No.1 of 2025 This I.A. has been file by the petitioner for condonation of delay of 271 day in filing the Criminal Revision Petition on account of outbreak of Covid-19 Pandemic.

2. For the reason stated in the application, this I.A. is allowed, condoning the delay.

CRIMINAL REVISION No.191 of 2021

3. Heard on the point of admission.

4. The present Criminal Revision Petition has been preferred against the order dated 17.01.2020 passed by learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Jamui in Maintenance Case No. 14 of 2012, whereby learned Family Court has enhanced the

Patna High Court CR. REV. No.191 of 2021(4) dt.27-06-2025 2/2 monthly maintenance amount from Rs.2,000/- to Rs. 2,500/-. Prior to the present impugned order, the maintenance @ Rs.2,000/- per month was fixed in the year 2009 by the order dated 05.03.2009 passed in Maintenance Case No. 16M of 2007.

5. Hence, I find that after passage of 11 years, the monthly maintenance has been enhanced only by Rs.500/-, which is too little. In fact, the enhancement should have been on the higher side. Even then, the petitioner has preferred this Criminal Revision Petition challenging this enhancement.

6. As such, I find that there is no reason to interfere in the impugned order.

7. Accordingly, the present petition is dismissed in limine.

(Jitendra Kumar, J.) Chandan/- U T