Patna High CourtCR. MISC./18342/2015bail granted

Gurmukh Thakur @ Gurumukh Thakur v. The State Of Bihar

2015-08-26Mr. Justice Rakesh Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.18342 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -290 Year- 2013 Thana -CHIRAIYA DistrictEASTCHAMPARAN(MOTIHARI) ====================================================== Gurmukh Thakur @ Gurumukh Thakur S/o Late Saryug Thakur, resident of Village- Phenhara, P.S.- Chiraiya, District- East Champaran. .... .... Petitioner

Versus

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Anuj Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. C.Sen Pd.Singh(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR ORAL ORDER 26-08-2015 Heard Sri Anuj Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Chandrasen Prasad Singh, learned Addl. Public Prosecutor.

This is the 2nd attempt for grant of bail on behalf of the petitioner in connection with Chairaiya P.S. Case no.290 of 2013 registered for the offence under Sections 25(1-A) (1-AA)(1-B), 26(2), 29 and 35 of the Arms Act and under Sections 17,18,20 and 22 of the UAP Act. Earlier, the prayer for bail of the petitioner was rejected along with bail petition of co-accused Jagarnath Thakur. The petitioner is in custody since 06.11.2013. It was submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that despite the fact that the prayer for bail of the petitioner was earlier rejected, no adequate progress has been taken place. In view of the fact and circumstances, particularly the

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.18342 of 2015 (2) dt.26-08-2015 2/2 fact that the petitioner is in custody since 06.11.2013, let the petitioner, Gurmukh Thakur @ Gurumukh Thakur be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-( ten thousand ) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Motihari in connection with Chiraiya P.S.Case no.290 of 2013 on conditions that (i) one of the bailors must be blood relation of the petitioner and (ii) on each and every date, during trial the petitioner shall remain physically present in the court below. If continuously on two dates without prior permission of the trial court, the petitioner remains absent, his bail bond shall stand automatically cancelled.

(Rakesh Kumar, J) NKS/- U