← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./2875/2025bail granted

Sri Das v. The State Of Bihar

2025-02-25Mr. Justice Chandra Prakash Singh3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.2875 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-603 Year-2024 Thana- HARSIDHI District- East Champaran ====================================================== Sri Das Son of Late Jagarnath Das R/o Village - Ghogharahan Bairiya, Ward No.- 04, P.S.- Harsidhi, District - East Champaran ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Abhishek Ranjan, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Ms.Asha Kumari, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH ORAL ORDER 25-02-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P for the State.

2. The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Harsidhi P.S. Case No. 603 of 2024 dated 08.11.2024 registered for the offences punishable u/ss 126, 115(2), 118, 109 and 352(2) of the B.N.S. and Section 37 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

3. As per the prosecution case, the petitioner in drunken condition is alleged to have assaulted the informant with knife causing injury on his back side of the body. The petitioner also attempted second blow with knife to the informant causing injury on his left hand. It is further alleged that when the grand-father of the informant came to rescue him,

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.2875 of 2025(2) dt.25-02-2025 2/3 the petitioner also assaulted him.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. The name of the petitioner has surfaced in this case merely on suspicion. Nothing has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. It is further submitted that the petitioner has no concern with the alleged offence. As per the injury report of the injured, the injury is simple in nature. The petitioner has one criminal antecedent as stated in para 3 of the bail petition. The petitioner is in custody since 09.11.2024.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the bail petition of the petitioner.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as well as the period of custody, the petitioner abovenamed, is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court concerned, East Champaran at Motihari in connection with Harsidhi P.S. Case No. 603 of 2024 with the condition :- (i) The petitioner is directed to remain physically present before the learned Court below on each and every date, failing which on two consecutive dates without reasonable

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.2875 of 2025(2) dt.25-02-2025 3/3 cause, the bail bond of the petitioner is liable to be cancelled.

7. The application stands allowed.

(Chandra Prakash Singh, J) Gautam/- U T