Patna High CourtCR. MISC./12481/2016bail granted

Gulteni Mia v. The State Of Bihar

2016-05-05Mr. Justice Jitendra Mohan Sharma2 pages

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.12481 of 2016 (3) dt.05-05-2016

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.12481 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -149 Year- 2015 Thana -NAUTAN District- SIWAN ======================================================

1. Gulteni Mia Son of Late Mahmood Mia resident of village - Hasua, P.S. Nautan, District - Siwan .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Md. Anis Akhtar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ram Sumiran Roy(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER 05-05-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. representing the State.

The petitioner seeks bail n connection with Nautan P.S. Case No. 149 of 2015 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 324, 307 and 504 of the Indian Penal Code.

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that during pendency of Cri. Misc. No. 5680 of 2016, the petitioner was arrested, resulting his prayer for anticipatory bail was dismissed as infructuous and other eight co-accused having similar allegation have been allowed pre-arrest bail vide Cri. Misc. No. 5680 of 2016 by another co-ordinate Bench of this Court to which the learned APP does not oppose.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.12481 of 2016 (3) dt.05-05-2016 In the facts and circumstances stated above, the petitioner, above named, is also directed to be released on bail on execution of bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sri. Manoj Kumar, learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Siwan in connection with Nautan P.S. Case No. 149 of 2015 subject to the conditions that one of the bailors must be near relative and another having sufficient immovable property within the territorial jurisdiction of the court concerned and the petitioner shall remain present on each and every date during trial and the default on two consecutive dates on his part without any reason shall disentitle the petitioner from privilege of bail.

(Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J) sushma/- U T