Vikash Singh @ Vikash Kumar Singh @ Vikash Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.6575 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-81 Year-2022 Thana- COMPLAINT CASE - DAUDNAGAR District- Aurangabad ====================================================== Vikash Singh @ Vikash Kumar Singh @ Vikash Kumar Son of Kameshwar Singh Village -Saranga PS -Barun District -Aurangabad ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

Leelawati Devi Daughter of Deenanath Prasad, W/o Vikash Singh, R/o Village -Saranga PS -Barun District -Aurangabad ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr. Birendra Kumar Singh, Adv.

For the State :

Mrs. Veena Kumari JaiswalAPP For the complainant/OP2:

None ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 05-08-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State. Despite valid service of notice, nobody appears on behalf of complainant/opposite party no. 2.

2. The petitioner, husband of the opposite party no. 2, apprehends his arrest in a complaint case punishable for the offence under Sections 498-A, 504 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. As per F.I.R., marriage of complainant was solemnized with this petitioner 5-6 years ago and out of wedlock, one child was born and thereafter, this petitioner and his family members started demanding dowry and due to nonfulfillment of same, she was subject to cruelty and harassment and ultimately, was forced to leave her matrimonial house. It is also alleged that this petitioner solemnized second marriage.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.6575 of 2025(5) dt.05-08-2025 2/2

4. While denying the allegations made in the present petition, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case merely because he happens to be husband of opposite party no. 2. At no point of time, petitioner demanded any dowry or committed torture with opposite party no. 2 and is still ready to keep the opposite party no. 2 with full honour and dignity. Moreover, the case is triable by the learned Magistrate. The petitioner has further relied upon the judgment of this Court in the case of Md. Naimul Haque Ansari @ Naimul Haque Ansari & Ors. Vs. The State of Bihar, reported in 2006(3) PLJR 182.

5. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, in the event of arrest or surrender within a period of eight weeks from today, let this petitioner, as named above, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned S.D.J.M., Daudnagar, Aurangabad (Bihar) in connection with Complaint Case No. 81 of 2022, subject to the conditions, as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) anay U T