Ranjit Kumar Sao @ Ranjeet Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.18363 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -37 Year- 2014 Thana -MAHILA P.S. District- NAWADA ====================================================== Ranjit Kumar Sao @ Ranjeet Kumar, Son of Ram Saran Lal Gupta, Resident of Village- Mangarbigha, P.S.- Nawada, District- Nawada. .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sheo Kumar Prasad For the Opposite Party/s : Mrs. Renuka Ratnakar (APP) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJENDRA KUMAR MISHRA ORAL ORDER 09-09-2015 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.
The petitioner is accused in connection with Nawada Mahila P.S. Case No. 37 of 2014 registered under sections 304(B), 34 of the I.P.C. pending in the Court of C.J.M., Nawada. The allegation of informant is that marriage of his daughter, Bidhi Bhushand Kumari, was solemnized with this petitioner before four and half years and from their wedlock, she gave birth of one son. Further allegation of the informant is that Ranjit Kumar Sao and others used to torture his daughter for demand of motorcycle. In the meantime, he also came to know that his son-in-law have illicit relation with his aunt Kushum Devi and for which they tortured the daughter of the informant and as a
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.18363 of 2015 (5) dt.09-09-2015 2/2 result of which, his daughter was killed.
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that it would appear from the F.I.R. that on giving information by the petitioner about serious condition of Bidhi Bhushan Kumari, informant had come to see his daughter but due to ulterior motive, he lodged this case with false story. Admittedly, daughter of the informant died in her Sasural within two years of her marriage and in the postmortem report, the cause of death is shown due to hanging. Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case, I am not inclined to allow the prayer of the petitioner for bail. Accordingly, this application is rejected. (Rajendra Kumar Mishra, J.) Shail/- U T