Patna High CourtCR. MISC./4107/2026bail granted

Munna Rajbanshi @ Munna Rajbsi v. The State Of Bihar

2026-01-27Mr. Justice R. P. Mishra2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.4107 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-453 Year-2025 Thana- SIRDALA District- Nawada ====================================================== Munna Rajbanshi @ Munna Rajbsi S/o- Chandramali Rajbanshi @ Chandramauli Rajbanshi Resident of Village- Narauli PS- Sirdalla DistrictNawada ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr. Sheo Nandan Prasad, Advocate For the Opposite Party :

Mr. Tarkeshwar Nath Thakur, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 27-01-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Sirdalla P.S. Case No. 453 of 2025 instituted for the offences punishable under Sections 30(a), 41 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

3. The prosecution case, in short, is that total 360 litres of illicit country-made liquor has been recovered from hut of the petitioner.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case. No incriminating article has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner rather the recovery has been made

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.4107 of 2026(2) dt.27-01-2026 2/2 from hut which does not belong to the petitioner. The petitioner has got no concern with the alleged recovery of liquor. The name of the petitioner has transpired on the basis of secret information. The petitioner is in custody since 26.12.2025 and has no criminal antecedent. There is no compliance of Section 103 of the Bharatiya Nagarika Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.

5. Learned APP for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as also the period of custody undergone by the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

7. Let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 15,000/- ( Rupees Fifteen Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Sirdalla P.S. Case No. 453 of 2025.

(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) atul/- U T