Patna High CourtCWJC/5337/2017disposed

Umesh Paswan v. The Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. And ORS

2017-05-17Mr. Justice Shivaji Pandey2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.5337 of 2017 =========================================================== Umesh Paswan Son of Late Baleshwar Paswan, Resident of Village- Noonpur, Post Office- Dharhara, Police Station- Hajipur Sadar, District- Vaishali. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. through its Chairman, having its registered office at G-9, Ali Yavar Jung Marg, Bandra (East), Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.

2. The Director (Refineries), Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. (Refineries Division), SCOPE Complex, Core- 2, 7, Institutional Area, Lodhi Road, New Delhi110003.

3. The Director (HR), Indian Oil Corporation Ltd., 3079/2, Sadiq Nagar, J.B. Tito Marg, New Delhi- 110049.

4. The General Manager, Indian Oil Corporation Ltd., Bihar State Office, Lok Nayak Jai Prakash Bhawan (5th Floor), Dak Bungalow Chowk, Patna- 800001.

5. The Senior Divisional Manager, Retail and Sales, Indian Oil Corporation Ltd., Maurya Complex, A Block, 3rd Floor, Dak Bungalow Road, Patna- 800001.

6. The Assistant Manager, Retail and Sales, Indian Oil Corporation Ltd., Maurya Complex, A Block, 3rd Floor, Dak Bungalow Road, Patna- 800001.

7. The Field Officer, Retail and Sales, Indian Oil Corporation Ltd., Maurya Complex, A Block, 3rd Floor, Dak Bungalow Road, Patna- 800001. .... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rakesh Kumar Soni, Adv. For the Respondent/s : Mr. Anil Kumar Sinha, Adv. Mr. Amlesh Kr. Verma, Adv.

=========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 17-05-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and counsel for the Indian Oil Corporation Limited.

In the present case, the petitioner is challenging the award dated 13.2.2017 passed against the petitioner by Hon'ble Justice Shyam Kishore Sharma (Retired), the sole Arbitrator in Arbitration Case No. 9 of 2016.

Patna High Court CWJC No.5337 of 2017 dt.17-05-2017 There is an alternative forum for redressal, without exhausting the alternative remedy, the petitioner has filed this petition which is not maintainable.

This application is, accordingly, dismissed with a liberty to the petitioner to redress his grievance under the Arbitration Act. (Shivaji Pandey, J) Rishi/- AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE NA Uploading Date 20.05.2017 Transmission Date NA