← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./2242/2020bail granted

Upendra Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

2020-01-16Mr. Justice S. Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.2242 of 2020 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-237 Year-2019 Thana- AMAS District- Gaya ====================================================== Upendra Yadav Son of Somar Yadav Resident of Village-Sawkala Tola Malrawadih, P.S.-Amas, District-Gaya.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Binod Murari Mishra For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Tarkeshwar Nath Thakur ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 16-01-2020 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

Petitioner, who is in custody seeks bail in a case registered under Section 30(a) of Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

Allegation is recovery of 40 litres of Mahua wine from the possession of petitioner.

It has been submitted on behalf of petitioner that he is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case on the basis of suspicion. Nothing was recovered from his conscious possession. Petitioner has no criminal antecedent and is in custody since 25.12.2019.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner named above be released on bail upon

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.2242 of 2020(2) dt.16-01-2020 2/2 furnishing bail bond of Rs. 20,000/- (twenty thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned court below, in connection with Amas P.S. Case No. 237 of 2019 subject to the conditions that:-

(1) Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.

(2) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be represented on each and every date fixed by the court.

(3) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.

(4) If the petitioner is found involved in similar nature of offences, after his release on bail the trial court shall take steps to cancel his bail bond.

(S. Kumar, J) veena/- U T