Ram Pravesh Sharma v. The State Of Bihar, Through The Chief Secretary, Govt. Of Bihar, Patna.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Writ Jurisdiction Case No.235 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-757 Year-2019 Thana- JEHANABAD COMPLAINT CASE District- Jehanabad ====================================================== RAM PRAVESH SHARMA S/O LATE SATYA NARAYAN SINGH @ SATYA NARAYAN SHARMA R/O VILLAGE- CHAKAND DIH, P.S- CHAKAND, DISTT.- GAYA.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
THE STATE OF BIHAR, THROUGH THE CHIEF SECRETARY, GOVT. OF BIHAR, PATNA. BIHAR 2.
THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, GOVT. OF BIHAR, PATNA. BIHAR 3.
THE INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, GAYA. BIHAR 4.
THE DEPUTY INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, GAYA. BIHAR 5.
THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, JEHANABAD. BIHAR 6.
THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, JEHANABAD, TOWN POLICE STATION, JEHANABAD. BIHAR 7.
SUNIL KUMAR, AGED ABOUT 40 YRS PRESENTLY POSTED AS OFFICER -INCHARGE OF CHAKAND POLICE STATION CHAKAND, GAYA. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Sanjay Kumar For the Respondent/s:
Mr. S.D. Yadav, AAG-9 Mr. Dinesh Maharaj, AC to AAG-11 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARVIND SINGH CHANDEL ORAL ORDER 23-07-2024 The present criminal writ application has been filed by the petitioner for directing the respondents to execute the non-bailable warrant of arrest issued against the respondent No.7 dated 21.09.2022 passed by the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jehanabad in Complaint Case No. 757 of 2019.
2. It is informed by learned counsel appearing for
Patna High Court CR. WJC No.235 of 2024(3) dt.23-07-2024 2/2 respondent No.5 i.e. Superintendent of Police, Jehanabad that respondent No.7 has surrendered before the court below on 09.07.204 and he has been granted bail by the court below itself, therefore, as of now this application has become infructuous.
3. The aforesaid fact has been admitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner and he also submits that he does not want to press this application as having become infructuous.
4. In view of the submission of the parties, this criminal writ application is dismissed as having been infructuous.
(Arvind Singh Chandel , J) brajesh/- U