Vidya Manjhi v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.10336 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-65 Year-2023 Thana- MATIYARIA District- West Champaran ====================================================== 1.

Vidya Manjhi Son Of Late Harish Manjhi R/O-D.K. Serhawa, P.S.- MATIYARIYA, Distt.-WEST Champaran, Bettiah 2.

Jagan Manjhi Son Of Vidya Manjhi R/O-D.K. Serhawa, P.S.- MATIYARIYA, Distt.-WEST Champaran, Bettiah 3.

Jagdish Manjhi @ Jagdish Kumar Manjhi Son Of Vidya Manjhi R/O-D.K. Serhawa, P.S.-MATIYARIYA, Distt.-WEST Champaran, Bettiah 4.

Jaglal Manjhi @ Jaglal Kumar Manjhi Son Of Vidya Manjhi R/O-D.K. Serhawa, P.S.-MATIYARIYA, Distt.-WEST Champaran, Bettiah ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Brajesh Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Dilip Kumar No. 1 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 22-02-2024 Heard Mr. Brajesh Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr. Dilip Kumar No. 1, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

2. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 341, 323, 447, 506, 324, 307, 427, 504/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. Petitioners along with other accused persons are said to have assaulted the informant and his family members by means of farsa.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are innocent and have been falsely implicated in

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.10336 of 2024(2) dt.22-02-2024 2/2 this case due to land dispute. He submits that there is case and counter case between the parties and both sides have sustained injury. He submits that the injury found upon the victim is simple in nature. He submits that there is general and omnibus allegation levelled against the petitioners. He further submits that petitioners have no criminal antecedent as stated in para-3 of the bail application.

5. Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for bail.

6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, let the above named petitioners in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Matiyariya P.S. Case No. 65 of 2023, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) devendra/- U T