Dr. Surendra Nath Sinha v. The State Of Bihar Through The Director General Of Police, Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Writ Jurisdiction Case No.592 of 2017 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-293 Year-2016 Thana- PIRBAHOR District- Patna ====================================================== Dr. Surendra Nath Sinha, Son of Sri Basudeo Sinha, Resident of MohallaAshok Nagar, P.S.- Kankarbagh, District- Patna. ... ... Petitioner

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Director General of Police, Bihar. 2.

The Senior Superintendent of Police, Patna.

3.

The Officer Incharge, Pirbahor Police Station, Patna. 4.

Dr. Alok Kumar, Son of Sri Harishchandra Ram, Resident of Village- Pinda Khurd, P.O.- Ghora Ghat, P.S.- Dobhi, District- Gaya. ... ... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Ms. Archana Singh, Advocate For the State :

Mr. Pankaj Kumar Singh, AC to GA-9 For the Resp No. 4 :

Ms. Ritika Rani, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL ORDER 06-10-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the State and learned counsel for the respondent no. 4.

2. The petitioner in the present case is seeking the following reliefs:- "(i) Issuance of writ in the Nature of certiorari for quashing the FIR of Pirbahor P.S. Case No. 293 of 2016 registered under sections 341, 323, 504/34 of Indian Penal Code and Section 3(X) of SC/ST Act.

(ii) For any other consequential relief/reliefs to which the petitioner is entitle by this Hon'ble Court in the facts and circumstances of the present case."

Patna High Court CR. WJC No.592 of 2017(13) dt.06-10-2023 2/2

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that during pendency of this application, police has completed investigation and has already submitted a final form in favour of the petitioner. In the aforesaid view of the matter, the petitioner would not press this application taking his rights and contentions reserved to be raised if occasion so arises in future.

4. Learned counsel for the State as well as learned counsel for the respondent no. 4 are present.

5. This writ application is being disposed of taking note of the aforementioned submissions of learned counsel for the petitioner. Rights and contentions of the petitioner are kept reserved.

(Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J) lekhi/- U