← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./3247/2026bail rejected

Akhilesh Ram @ Akalish Ram v. The State Of Bihar

2026-02-13Mr. Justice Prabhat Kumar Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.3247 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-290 Year-2025 Thana- GAURICHAK District- Patna ====================================================== Akhilesh Ram @ Akalish Ram Son of Ramji Ram Resident Of VillageSanghat Par P.s- Panchrukhiya (Gaurichak) District -Patna ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ritwik Thakur, Ms. Vaishnavi Singh, Advocates For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Shailendra Kumar Singh, A.P.P.

For the Informant :

Ms. Naman Kumar Sinha, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 13-02-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, informant and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. Petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Gaurichak P. S. Case No. 290 of 2025 in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 61(2), 103(1), 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

3. As per F.I.R., this petitioner appears to be assailant of the daughter of informant and on his disclosure, weapons were recovered which were used in the commission of offence.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. Petitioner has been made accused in this case only on suspicion and he is in custody since 26.05.2025.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State as well as learned

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.3247 of 2026(2) dt.13-02-2026 2/2 counsel for the informant vehemently opposed the bail application.

6. Considering the nature of accusation and gravity of the offence, prayer for bail of the petitioner is rejected.

7. However, since petitioner is in custody since 26.05.2025, Trial Court is directed to expedite and conclude the trial, preferably, within a period of one year from the date of receipt/production of copy of this order.

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) Navya/- U T