Jai Prakash Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.15539 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-114 Year-2017 Thana- MANIHARI District- Katihar ====================================================== 1.

Jai Prakash Yadav Son of Krishna Narayan Yadav @ Krishnanand Yadav Resident of Village- Pipra, Kamatpur, P.S.- Pipra, District- Supaul 2.

Gopal Kumar Gupta @ Gopal Kumar Son of Upendra Prasad Gupta Resident of Village- Pipra Kamatpur, P.S.- Pipra, District- Supaul. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Bimal Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA KUMAR ORAL ORDER 23-11-2021 Let the defects, if any, be removed within four weeks after complete start of the physical Court.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 323/332/353/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Allegation is that the trucks which were found overloaded were of the petitioners. The petitioners have got no criminal antecedent.

Considering the nature of allegation, let the petitioners, above named, in the event of their arrest or

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.15539 of 2021(2) dt.23-11-2021 2/2 surrender before the Court below within a period of thirty days from the date of receipt of the order, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.20,000/- (Twenty Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Court-below where the case is pending in connection with Mahihari Police Station Case No.114 of 2017, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure as well as condition that the petitioners shall fully cooperate with the investigation/trial of the case, failing which the court below shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bond of the petitioners.

The petitioners shall not leave the country without permission of the trial Court.

(Birendra Kumar, J) Mkr./- U T