Ram Parikshan Yadav v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.5715 of 2017 ====================================================== Ram Parikshan Yadav Son of Saukhi Lal Yadav resident of Village - Akdara, P.S. - Khajouli, District - Madhubani.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

2. The Principal Secretary, Human Resources Development Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

3. The District Magistrate, Madhubani.

4. The District Education Officer, Madhubani.

5. The District Programme Officer, Madhubani.

6. The Block Development Officer, Khajauli, Madhubani.

7. The Block Education Officer, Khajuali, District - Madhubani. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ratanakar Jha For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Kameshwar Kumar -Gp17 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MADHURESH PRASAD ORAL ORDER 04-12-2018 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the State.

No clear or tangible threat has been made out by the petitioner so as to necessitate exercise of jurisdiction under article 226 of the Constitution of India.

Mere apprehension has been expressed that he is likely to be removed or terminated from the post of Block teacher.

Counsel for the petitioner makes submission that his appointment has been put to question in the proceeding arising out of CWJC No. 18611 of 2016 wherein he has been

Patna High Court CWJC No.5715 of 2017(2) dt.04-12-2018 2/2 impleaded as a respondent.

This Court would only observe that if there is any threat to the petitioner in the proceeding arising out of CWJC No. 18611 of 2016 it is for him to appear in that proceedings and defend his appointment.

No order is required to be passed in the instant proceeding as the writ petition is premature. The writ petition is dismissed.

(Madhuresh Prasad, J.) SNkumar/- U