Kundan Kumar Sinha Sahay @ Kundan Kumar Sahay Sinha And ORS v. The Union Of India And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No 1098 of 2017 ===========================================================

1. Kundan Kumar Sinha Sahay @ Kundan Kumar Sahay Sinha Son of late Sriniwas Sahay

2. Ranjay Kumar Singh Son of Sri Nageshwar Singh

3. Om Prakash Singh Son of late Ram Sahay Singh

4. Anjani Dubey Son of late Suresh Chand Dubey

5. Kamta Rai Son of late Dhanesh Rai all residents of Village- Phuhhan, P.S. Barhara, District- Bhojpur.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The Union of India through the Secretary, Ministry of Drinking Water and Sanitation Nirmal Bharan Abhiyan (NBA), 12th floor, Paryavaran Bhawan, CGO Complex, Lodhi Road, New Delhi- 110003.

2. The Under Secretary (NBA), Ministry of Drinking Water and Sanitation Nirmal Bharan Abhiyan (NBA), 12th floor, Paryavaran Bhawan, CGO Complex, Lodhi Road, New Delhi- 110003.

3. The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Public Health Engineering Department, Bihar, Patna.

4. The Principal Secretary, Vigilance Department, Government of Bihar, Suchna Patna.

5. The Special Executive officer, Public Health Engineering Department, Bihar, Patna.

6. The District Magistrate, Ara at Bhojpur.

7. The Deputy Development Commissioner, District Ara.

8. Mukhiya , East Babura Gram Panchayat, District- Bhojpur.

9. Mahila Udyog, Dugdh Utpadan Sahakari Samiti through its Secretary, Smt Gayatri Devi Wife of Deo Kishore Singh all resident of Village- Phuhhan, P.S. Barhara, District- Bhojpur.

10. The Block Development Officer, Barhara.

.... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr Sachin Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr S Raza Ahmad, AAG 5 =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE And HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL JUDGMENT (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) Date: 08-05-2017 In the matter of financial irregularities committed under

Patna High Court CWJC No.1098 of 2017 dt.08-05-2017 2/2 the Nirmal Bharat Abhiyan, it is the grievance of the petitioners that a complaint made to the Vigilance Department of the State Government, respondent No 4, the Vigilance Department of the State is not taking action in the complaint.

2 The petitioners can move the Lokayukt Organization who is empowered to look into the matter and, therefore, granting liberty to the petitioners to file a petition before the Lokayukt Organization, we dispose of the matter under the confidence that the Lokayukt Organization shall look into the grievance of the petitioners. (Rajendra Menon, CJ) (Sudhir Singh, J) AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE NA Uploading Date 11.05.2017 Transmission Date M.E.H./- NA