← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/1441/2025dismissed

Dharmendra Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

2025-03-21Mr. Justice Satyavrat Verma2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1441 of 2025 ====================================================== Dharmendra Yadav S/O Ram Chandra Yadav, R/O-124 Jigrawn, P.O. - Jigrawan, P.S. Maharajganj, Distt. - Siwan ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the District Magistrate, Siwan. 2.

The District Magistrate, Siwan, Distt. - Siwan 3.

The Sub Divisional Officer, Maharajganj, Siwan, Distt. - Siwan 4.

The Circle Officer, Maharajganj, Distt. - Siwan. 5.

The Officer - In - Charge, Maharajganj Police Station, Distt. - Siwan. 6.

Jangi Yadav S/O Manshi Yadav, resident of village - Jigarwan, P.S. - Maharajganj, Distt. - Siwan.

7.

Musafir Yadav S/O Manshi Yadav resident of village - Jigarwan, P.S. - Maharajganj, Distt. - Siwan.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Manoj Kumar Madhukar, Advocate For the State :

Mr. Sita Ram Yadav, GP-16 Mr. Jitendra Kumar, AC to GP-16 For the Resp. No. 6 & 7 :

Mr. Prashant Kashyap, Advocate Mr. Ashok Kumar, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 21-03-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned AC to GP-16 for the State and learned counsel appearing on behalf of private respondents no. 6 and 7.

2. In the nature of prayer made in the writ application, the Court is not inclined to entertain the same for the reason that from perusal of the prayer made in the writ application, it would manifest that the dispute is between private individuals as the petitioner is claiming that private respondents no. 6 and 7 have come on his land.

Patna High Court CWJC No.1441 of 2025(2) dt.21-03-2025 2/2

3. Since the dispute is between two private individuals, the petitioner has remedy to avail in accordance with law before a Court of competent civil jurisdiction.

4. Hence, the writ application is dismissed.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) Kundan/- U