Jitendra Manjhi @ Jitan Manjhi @ Anka @ Ankaj v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.8305 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-212 Year-2022 Thana- BUNIYAD GANJ District- Gaya ====================================================== Jitendra Manjhi @ Jitan Manjhi @ Anka @ Ankaj S/o Budhan Manjhi @ Dev Kumar Manjhi R/o Village-Usari Tola, Bhagalpur, P.S.- Buniyadganj, DistrictGaya. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Sharda Nand Mishra, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Nityanand, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 18-02-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2.

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Buniyadganj P.S. Case No. 212 of 2022 instituted for the offence under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code. 3.

Prosecution case in short is that informant was accosted with five unknown persons who came out from the bush and on the point of pistol snatched two mobile phones phone and Rs. 14,000/- and fled away.

4.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner is in custody since 24-07-2024. Petitioner bears two criminal antecedents, as per disclosure made in paragraph No. 3 of the bail application.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.8305 of 2025(2) dt.18-02-2025 2/2 5.

It has been further submitted by the petitioner's counsel that petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case. Petitioner is not named in the FIR. Name of the petitioner has transpired during course of investigation. Nothing has been recovered from the possession of the petitioner. Petitioner has no concern with the occurrence in question. Police after investigation has submitted charge sheet in this case. Other coaccused has been granted bail by the lower court itself. 6.

Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner. 7.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, period of custody of the petitioner, manner of petitioner's implication and charge sheet being submitted, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. 8.

Let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Buniyadganj P.S. Case No. 212 of 2022.

(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) Raj Kishore/- U T