Rinku Devi v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.4119 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-138 Year-2024 Thana- DELHA District- Gaya ====================================================== Rinku Devi W/o Biku Das R/o vill- Chhotki Delha, Tekari Road, P.S- Delha, District - Gaya ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Mrigendra Kumar, Adv.
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mrs. Asha Devi, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KHATIM REZA ORAL ORDER 12-02-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.
2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Delha PS Case No. 138 of 2024, dated 04-06-2024 instituted for the offence punishable under Sections 324, 307 and 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code.
3. The prosecution case in short is that on 03-06-2024 while the brother of informant was returning from his newly constructed house, he told the informant and his mother that he is going to Chhotki Nawada Gandhi More to take Rs. 50,000/- from Anant Kumar and Babu Kumar @ Abhishek Kumar. At about 6.30 PM, informant got information that accused persons, namely, Anant Kumar and Babu Kumar @ Abhishek Kumar brutally assaulted to his brother, due to which, his brother Ravi
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.4119 of 2025(2) dt.12-02-2025 2/3 Kumar and his friend Prince Kumar are seriously injured and thereafter neighbours admitted them in serious condition in Gopalpur JPN Hospital from where they referred to A.N.M.C.H. Gaya for better treatment where his brother Ravi Kumar has died.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is innocent and she has been falsely implicated in this case. It is further submitted that the petitioner is not named in the FIR, but after investigation, the I.O. has submitted charge sheet against the petitioner. The petitioner being the mother of the FIR named accused persons has been made accused in the instant case. No cogent material has come during investigation against the petitioner to suggest her involvement in the present occurrence. From perusal of the FIR itself, it would appear that there is no whisper against the petitioner to commit any crime. Lastly, it has been submitted that petitioner is in custody since 21-06-2024 having no criminal antecedents.
5. Learned APP has opposed the prayer for bail.
6. Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case and submissions of learned counsel for the parties, let the petitioner be released on bail upon furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.4119 of 2025(2) dt.12-02-2025 3/3 each to the satisfaction of the learned ACJM 1st Gaya, in Delha PS Case No. 138 of 2024.
7. The application stands allowed.
(Khatim Reza, J) shyambihari/- U T