← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./4367/2022bail rejected

Jeevak Singh v. The State Of Bihar

2022-06-08Mr. Justice Arun Kumar Jha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.4367 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-151 Year-2021 Thana- SABAUR District- Bhagalpur ====================================================== Jeevak Singh, aged about 22 years, Male Son of Yogendra Singh, Resident of Village Rattichak, P.S. - Gouradih, District - Bhagalpur. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Bijendra Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Binod Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR JHA ORAL ORDER 08-06-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

Let the defect(s), if any, as pointed out by the office be removed within a period of four weeks from today. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Sabour (Goradih) P.S. Case No. 151 of 2021 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 307, 447, 504, 506, 120(B) of the Indian Penal Code and 27 of the Arms Act. The allegation against the petitioner is that he shot at the husband of the informant who received injury in his left thigh.

Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the informant is not an eyewitness and the occurrence alleged did not take place. There was no intention to kill anybody as is

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.4367 of 2022(2) dt.08-06-2022 2/2 apparent from the FIR. The petitioner is in custody since 03.08.2021.

Learned APP has opposed the contention of learned counsel of the petitioner.

Having regard to the facts and circumstances made hereinabove and the fact that the petitioner is alleged to be a person who fired the shot with intention to kill the informant, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail at this stage. The prayer for bail of the petitioner, stands rejected. However, if the trial is not concluded within six months, the petitioner may renew his prayer for bail. (Arun Kumar Jha, J) Anand Kr.

U T