Ranjeet Kumar Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.4263 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-434 Year-2022 Thana- ARA MUFFSIL District- Bhojpur ====================================================== RANJEET KUMAR YADAV Son of Rajendra Yadav R/o- Dhamar, P.S- Ara (M) Dist- Bhojpur (Bihar) ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Pankaj Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Arvind Kumar Pandey, APP-84 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER 27-04-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

Petitioner seeks bail, who is in custody since 17.12.2022 in connection with Ara (M) P.S. Case No. 434 of 2022, F.I.R. dated 16.12.2022 for the offences punishable under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018.

Recovery is of total 20 liters of country made liquor from the possession of the petitioner.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has clean antecedent and he has falsely been implicated in the present case. He further submits that it appears from the F.I.R. as well as seizure list that nothing has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner rather

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.4263 of 2023(2) dt.27-04-2023 2/3 the recovery has been made from the open place and petitioner has no concern at all with the alleged recovery of illicit liquor. He further submits that there is non-compliance with mandatory procedure prescribed for recovery under Section 100 of Cr.P.C. He further submits that the police after investigation submitted the charge sheet against the petitioner and the petitioner is in judicial custody since 17.12.2022.

The learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, petitioner has clean antecedent and nothing has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Exclusive Special Excise Court No.1, Bhojpur, Ara in connection with Ara (M) P.S. Case No. 434 of 2022, subject to the following conditions:-

1. Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court and shall remain physically present as directed by the court and on his absence on two

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.4263 of 2023(2) dt.27-04-2023 3/3 consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be cancelled by the Court below.

2. If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

3. And further condition that the court below shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in case at any stage it is found that the petitioner has concealed his criminal antecedent, the court below shall take step for cancellation of bail bond of the petitioner. However, the acceptance of bail bonds in terms of the above-mentioned order shall not be delayed for purpose of or in the name of verification.

(Rajesh Kumar Verma, J) mdrashid/- U T