Md. Kausar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.20116 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -285 Year- 2013 Thana -KORHA District- KATIHAR ======================================================
1. Md. Kausar Son of SK. Murshid resident of village - Baria Kewala, P.S. Amdabad, District - Katihar .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Mukesh Kumar Jha For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Pramod Kr.Panday(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL ORDER 17-06-2015 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.
The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offences under Sections 395 and 397 of the Indian Penal Code.
As per the First Information Report accused persons have taken away Rs.7,00,000/- from the passengers including the informant Rs.9,000/ along with Samsung mobile. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that nothing has been recovered from the possession of the petitioner nor he has been put on T.I.P. Other co-accused, namely, Md. Azimuddin Ansari alias Guddu alias Azimuddin alias Guddu Ansari has been granted bail by this Court vide Cr. Misc.
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.20116 of 2015 (2) dt.17-06-2015 No.14988 of 2014.
Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case, let petitioner, Md. Kausar, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Katihar in Korha P.S. Case No.285 of 2013, subject to the conditions that (i) one of the bailors shall be a close relative of the petitioner (ii) If the petitioner is found involved in future in similar type of case the prosecution will be at liberty to make prayer for cancellation of his bail and the court below will pass necessary order including cancellation of bail and (iii) petitioner would participate in the court proceeding and in the event of being absent on two consecutive dates, the court below will be at liberty to cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner. (Shivaji Pandey, J) Vinay/- U T