← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/711/2023disposed

Dhanesh Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2025-02-11Mr. Justice Anjani Kumar Sharan2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.711 of 2023 ====================================================== Dhanesh Kumar Son of Deoki Nandan Sharma, Resident Mohalla- Patel Nagar Sonaroo Road, Police Station- Fatuha, District- Patna. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through its Additional Chief Secretary, Department of Education, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2.

The Additional Chief Secretary, Department of Education, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3.

The Director, Secondary Education Government of Bihar, Budh Marg, Patna.

4.

The District Education Officer, Patna.

5.

The District Education Officer, Bhojpur at Ara. 6.

The District Teacher Employment Unit, through Deputy Development Commissioner.

7.

The Bhojpur Zila Parishad, Higher Secondary Teacher Employment Unit. 8.

The Patna Zila Parishad, Higher Secondary Teacher Employment Unit. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Sanjay Kumar For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Subhash Chandra Mishra ( Sc 16) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 11-02-2025 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2. Having gone through the case in its entirety and heard learned counsel for the parties, it would be deem, fit, proper and in the interest of justice, to relegate the case of the petitioner before the concerned authority for just and proper decision.

3. Accordingly, I direct the petitioner to file a detailed representation before the Additional Chief Secretary,

Patna High Court CWJC No.711 of 2023(3) dt.11-02-2025 2/2 Department of Education, Government of Bihar (respondent no.2) along with the documents, which have been annexed in this writ application, in support of his claim, within a period of four weeks from today. Respondent No.2 is directed to consider the case of the petitioner after affording opportunity of personal hearing and pass a reasoned and speaking order in accordance with law within four weeks from the date of receipt of such representation.

4. It is made clear that respondent no.2 shall be solely liable for non-compliance of this order within the stipulated period.

5. With the aforesaid direction, this writ application stands disposed of.

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) Trivedi/- U