← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./4752/2023dismissed

Ravi Kumar Ray @ Ravi Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2023-04-07Mr. Justice Anjani Kumar Sharan2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.4752 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-577 Year-2019 Thana- MINAPUR District- Muzaffarpur ====================================================== RAVI KUMAR RAY @ RAVI KUMAR S/O RAMSHRESHTH RAY Resident of Village- Rani Khaira, P.S.- Minapur, District- Muzaffarpur. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Manoj Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Md. Nazir Ansari ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 07-04-2023 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Minapur P.S. Case No.577 of 2019, registered for the offence punishable under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code. Accusation is of snatching ornaments from the informant.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the present case. It is submitted that the petitioner has got one criminal antecedent as stated in paragraph-3 of the bail petition. It is further submitted that petitioner is not named in the FIR. During investigation, one person was apprehended and he disclosed the name of the petitioner and on that basis the petitioner is made accused in the present case. It is also

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.4752 of 2023(2) dt.07-04-2023 2/2 submitted that no incriminating article has been recovered either from conscious possession of the petitioner or from the house of the petitioner.

Learned APP for the State opposed the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner by submitting that the petitioner has got one criminal antecedent of similar nature. Taking into consideration the nature of offence, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on anticipatory bail. Accordingly, the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner is hereby rejected.

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) S.KUMAR/- U T