Tunna Singh @ Tannu Singh @ Tunna @ Rakesh Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.5895 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-237 Year-2014 Thana- BARH District- Patna ====================================================== Tunna Singh @ Tannu Singh @ Tunna @ Rakesh Kumar, Son of Yogendra Singh R/o village- Parsawan, P.S- Pandarak, District Patna. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Manoj Kumar Pandey For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Pushpa Sinha ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR JHA ORAL ORDER 04-02-2019 Heard both sides.
The petitioner apprehends his arrest in Barh P.S. Case No.237 of 2014, registered under Sections 307, 324 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code and 27 of the Arms Act. The informant alleged that while his son was locking the shutters of the shop, Ravishankar Vidyarthi made firing which hit on the buttock of the son of the informant and the second firing was made by Tunna, the petitioner, but the firing did not hit the son of the informant. The son of the informant fled away and took shelter in the clinic of Dr. Pankaj Kumar. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the address and parentage of the petitioner has not been mentioned in the FIR. The firing made by the petitioner did not hit the son of the informant. The involvement of the petitioner in the
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.5895 of 2019(2) dt.04-02-2019 2/2 present case is on the basis of merely suspicion but I find that the informant made very specific allegation that the petitioner and Ravishankar Vidyarthi having conspired with each other came on the place of occurrence having armed with firearm and firstly Ravishankar Vidyarthi fired which hit the buttock of the son of the informant. The petitioner also alleged to have fired but the same did not hit.
Taking into consideration the facts aforesaid, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on anticipatory bail. Accordingly, the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is rejected.
(Prabhat Kumar Jha, J) S.KUMAR/- U T