Golu @ Sanny Dewal @ Golu Sunny Dewal v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.5181 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-322 Year-2025 Thana- SILAO District- Nalanda ====================================================== 1.
Golu @ Sanny Dewal @ Golu Sunny Dewal S/o Birmani Rajak 2.
Ajodhya Rajak @ Ayodhya Rajak S/o Shyam Sundar Rajak Both R/o Village - Gandhupur, P.S - Silao, District - Nalanda ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mrs.Sarita Kumari, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Zainul Abedin, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER 28-01-2026 Heard Mrs.Sarita Kumari, learned counsel for the petitioners, learned counsel for the informant and Mr.Zainul Abedin, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.
2. The petitioners seek bail, who are in custody since 01.11.2025 in connection with Silao P.S. Case No. 322 of 2025, F.I.R. dated 31.10.2025 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 190, 191(2), 191(3), 109(1), 126(2), 115(2),74,303(2) and 351(3) and 352 of BNS.
3. The prosecution case in brief is that the informant namely Veena Devi stating therein that on 31.10.2025 at about 8.30 my land is situated at Gandhupur Thana No. 467, which Khata No. 32, Kheshra No. 1084 is my father-in-law property. Khata No. 32, Kheshra No. 1084 in which father-in-law's
2/4 property Title Suit No. 490 of 2022 pending in the Court. On getting information Veena Devi, one of my maternal uncles attacked one with lathi, danda, pistols butt, then my family members came after getting the information, they also killed one and snatched the gold chain. They were will her, in which the injured persons broke Veena Devi's hand, broke her head with the butt of the pistol, broke Nibha Devi's leg and broke her head, took away two bhar of gold chain and also took away Veena Devi's gold chain. All of them together attacked with Hathiyar, lathi, danda and pistols and caused bloodshed. Even before this there was a dispute whose case number is 111 of 2025 which is registered in Silao Police Station.
4. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that petitioner No.1 carries one more case other than the present one and petitioner No.2 has clean antecedent. They have falsely been implicated in the present case due to admitted land dispute between the parties. There is case and counter case. One title Suit No. 490 of 2022 is going on between the parties and it appears from the FIR that there is no specific allegation of any assault or overt-act attributed against the petitioners rather there is general and omnibus allegation against all the accused persons including the petitioners and the
3/4 petitioners are in custody since 01.11.2025.
5. Learned counsel for the informant and learned A.P.P. for the State have vehemently opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioners.
6. Considering the aforesaid facts, let the petitioners, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten Thousand)each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned C.J.M., Nalanda in connection with Silao P.S. Case No. 322 of 2025, with the following conditions:- (I) Petitioners shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the Court and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and on theri absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, their bail bond shall be cancelled by the Court below. (II) If the petitioners tamper with the evidence or the witnesses, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.
(III) And, further condition that the court below shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioners and in case at any stage, it is found that the petitioners have concealed their criminal antecedents, the court below shall take step for
4/4 cancellation of bail bond of the petitioners. However, the acceptance of bail bonds in terms of the above-mentioned order shall not be delayed for purpose of or in the name of verification.
(Rajesh Kumar Verma, J) Nitesh/- U T