Md. Tanvir v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.5361 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-37 Year-2024 Thana- MATIHANI District- Begusarai ====================================================== Md. Tanvir Son of Md. Gyas Resident of Village- Lalpur, Ward No. 6, P.S.- Matihani, Distt.- Begusarai ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Dhirendra Kumar, Adv.
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Dr. Mrityunjaya Kr. Gautam, APP For the Informant : Mr. Randhir Kumar No.1, Adv. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 14-02-2025
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned A.P.P. for the State and the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the informant.
2. The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Section 447, 323, 428, 504, 506, 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the instant regular bail application has been filed in terms of the liberty granted to the petitioner to renew his prayer for bail after framing of charge in Cr. Misc. No.55955/2024 which was permitted to be withdrawn by an order dated 22.11.2024 with the aforesaid liberty. It is further submitted that charges against the petitioner stands framed on 03.01.2025 (Annexure-4).
4. Learned A.P.P. and the learned counsel appearing
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.5361 of 2025(2) dt.14-02-2025 2/2 on behalf of the informant opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner.
5. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.25000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Matihani P.S. Case No.37/2024.
6. Further, one of the bailors of the petitioner shall be his grand father (Nana) Md. Hatim.
7. It is made clear that if the learned trial court comes to a conclusion that petitioner after his release is trying to delay the trial in any manner, in that event, the learned trial court shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner. (Satyavrat Verma, J) amit/- U T