Md. Matiur Rahman v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.3004 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-226 Year-2025 Thana- RAUTA District- Purnia ====================================================== Md. Matiur Rahman S/O Late Md. Yasin R/O Vill.- Mahsel, Ward no. 2, P.S.- Rauta, Dist.- Purnea.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Abhishek, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Manoj Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL DUTTA MISHRA ORAL ORDER 09-04-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Rauta P.S. Case No. 226 of 2025, instituted under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 118(2), 109, 3(5) of the B.N.S.

3. As per the prosecution case, on the date and time of occurrence brother of informant was sitting in his drawing room then petitioner along with other accused persons came there with sharp weapons and started abusing him. The specific allegation against the petitioner is that he assaulted Md. Rabbani Alam on his neck and hand with Dabia due to which he allegedly got injured.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.3004 of 2026(3) dt.09-04-2026 2/2 case due to land dispute. He is an old man having no criminal antecedent. Informant side were the aggressor. Petitioner undertakes to co-operate in the investigation and trial.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner and submits that the injury to the injured is on the neck and hand caused by sharp object and the nature of injury is grievous and there is direct allegation against the petitioner causing such injury to the injured.

6. On perusal of case diary, it appears that witnesses have supported the prosecution case. The specific allegation of assault by Dabia on neck and hand of injured which is corroborated by the injury report which shows injury grievous in nature caused by sharp object.

7. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and there is direct allegation against the petitioner causing grievous injury on hand and neck of the injured, this Court is not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on anticipatory bail. Accordingly, the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is rejected.

(Sunil Dutta Mishra, J) rakhi/- U T