← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/1929/2020disposed

Paritosh Goel v. The State Of Bihar

2023-09-21Mr. Justice Rajiv Roy2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No 1929 of 2020 ====================================================== Paritosh Goel son of late Pramod Prasad resident of Village- Pandey Colony, Betiah Hata, Alhadadpur, Gorakhpur, (U.P).

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Health Deptt., Government of Bihar, Patna.

2.

The Director in Chief, Health Department, Government of Bihar. 3.

The Regional Deputy Director, Magadh Division, Gaya. 4.

The Civil Surgeon, Gaya.

5.

The Accountant General of Bihar, Patna.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

M/ Jagannath Prasad, Vijaya Laxmi Srivastava, Advocates For the S t a t e :

Mr Madhusudan Rai, AC to SC XXIII For the A G :

Mr Arun Kumar Arun, Advocate ======================================================

CORAM:

HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 21-09-2023 Heard Ms Vijaya Laxmi Srivastava, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr Madhusudan Rai, learned AC to SC XXIII.

2 The prayer is for the following reliefs:

"(i) For issuance of writ in the nature of mandamus directing and commanding the respondents for making payment of the dues amount of ACP/MACP which is due till date after retirement of father of the petitioner.

(ii) For directing and commanding the respondents to make payment of interest of 12% per annum.

(iii) Also for commanding the

Patna High Court CWJC No.1929 of 2020(3) dt.21-09-2023 2/2 respondents for granting the benefit of first ACP and second ACP and the consequential monetary benefit and issue a necessary order in this regard.

(iv) For issuance of any other relief/reliefs for which the petitioner is legally entitled in the eye of law."

3 Learned counsel for the petitioner, at the outset, submits that the documents which were asked for, have been submitted before the concerned respondents but decision is wanting.

4 In the light of the aforesaid submission put forward by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the Director-in-Chief, Health Department, Bihar, Patna (respondent No 2) is directed to look into the matter and pass necessary order withing a period of three months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order.

5 Naturally, the consequential benefit has to flow within a period of next two months.

6 The writ petition stands disposed of with the aforesaid direction.

(Rajiv Roy, J) M.E.H./- U