Anubhav Kumar Singh @ Abhinav Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.4832 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-269 Year-2025 Thana- MANJHI District- Saran ====================================================== Anubhav Kumar Singh @ Abhinav Kumar Singh S/O Late Kamakhya Singh @ Kamakhya Narayan Singh R/o Village- Madansanth, P.s.- Daudpur, District- Saran ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Kundan Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Surendra Kumar,APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 03-02-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has prayed for regular bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under sections 309 (4) of the BNS.

3. The case of the prosecution is that while the informant was at his shop, four persons riding on a bike having masks on their faces arrived there and entered the shop and at gunpoint took away a sum of Rs. 3,20,000/-, two mobiles and also looted Rs. 5000/- from the customer, namely, Kaushalya Devi. Thereafter, they fled away. Further case of the informant is that he was able to apprehend one of the miscreants along with bike, who is the petitioner herein, and from the possession

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.4832 of 2026(2) dt.03-02-2026 2/3 of this petitioner, weapons and cartridge were recovered.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in connection with the present case. It is further submitted that the petitioner was apprehended earlier in connection with Manjhi P.S.Case No. 270 of 2025 and after that he was remanded in the present case. It is further submitted that no stolen property was recovered from the conscious possession of this petitioner and the police have not annexed any seizure list to substantiate the alleged recovery. Moreover, the petitioner is languishing in judicial custody since 09.09.2025.

5.

Learned APP appearing for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer of regular bail stating that the petitioner has six criminal antecedents.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, this court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be released on bail in connection with Manjhi P.S. Case No. 269 of 2025 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned ACJM -IV, Saran at Chapra, subject to the condition that the petitioner shall cooperate in the trial and shall mark his

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.4832 of 2026(2) dt.03-02-2026 3/3 attendance at concerned police station weekly, failing which the learned Magistrate will be at liberty to pass appropriate orders. (Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) Jagdish/- U T