Akhilesh Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.3652 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-39 Year-2024 Thana- MAHILA THANA District- Begusarai ====================================================== Akhilesh Kumar S/O Maheshwar Yadav Village- Dariyapur, PS- Nayagaon, District- Begusarai ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Sandip Kumar Gautam For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Abhay Kumar Roy ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAWNEET KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 08-10-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in Begusarai Mahila P.S. Case No. 39 of 2024 registered under Sections 115(2), 127(1), 352, 351(2), 308(4) of the BNS, 2023.

3. As per the prosecution story, on the false pretext of marriage, the petitioner established physical relation with the informant (victim) and continued the same with her giving threatening to her of making obscene photograph viral on social media and also of killing her brother and ultimately, the petitioner made the obscene photograph of the informant viral on social media.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that on

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.3652 of 2025(6) dt.08-10-2025 2/2 29.08.2024, the petitioner was on duty in Delhi and he has falsely been implicated in the present case due to previous dispute.

5. Learned APP has opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail by submitting that though, it may be consensual relationship of the informant (victim) with the petitioner but the petitioner is said to have made the obscene photograph of the informant (victim) viral on social media and this act of the petitioner has destroyed the honour and respect of the victim in the society and has ruined the rest of the life of the informant.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, the petitioner does not deserve the privilege of anticipatory bail. Accordingly, the anticipatory bail application is rejected. (Nawneet Kumar Pandey, J) priyanka/- U T