Guddu Mehta v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.9057 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -10 Year- 2014 Thana -RAFIGANJ District- AURANGABAD ====================================================== Guddu Mehta Son of Kripal Mahto, Resident of Village- Narhar Amba, P.S.- Amba, District- Aurangabad .... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== with Criminal Miscellaneous No.11436 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -10 Year- 2014 Thana -RAFIGANJ District- AURANGABAD ======================================================

1. Avinash Kumar Son of Ramjivan Mehta, resident of village- Chandauli, P.S.- Madanpur, District- Aurangabad

2. Naresh Mehta @ Naresh Kumar @ Naresh Mahto, resident of villageDadhapabigaha, P.S.- Kutumba, District- Aurangabad .... .... Petitioners

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== with Criminal Miscellaneous No.11841 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -10 Year- 2014 Thana -RAFIGANJ District- AURANGABAD ====================================================== Sunil Kumar Son of Akhilesh Mehta R/o Village Dadhapa Bigha, P.S. Kutumba, District Aurangabad .... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

(In Cr.Misc. No.9057 of 2015) For the Petitioner : Mr. Ashok Kumar No.6, Advocate.

For the Opposite Party : Mrs. Pushpa Sinha No.2(App) (In Cr.Misc. No.11436 of 2015) For the Petitioner : Mr. Bachan Jee Ojha, Advocate.

For the Opposite Party : Mr. Sanjay Kumar (App) (In Cr.Misc. No.11841 of 2015) For the Petitioner : Mr. Rajeshwar Singh, Advocate.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.9057 of 2015 (2) dt.22-04-2015 2/2 For the Opposite Party : Mr. M.K. Khare(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR JHA ORAL ORDER 22-04-2015 Since all the cases have arisen out of one occurrence, they are being disposed of by this common order. Heard both sides.

The petitioners seek bail in Rafiganj P.S. Case No. 10 of 2014, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 395, 412 and other Sections of the Indian Penal Code. The petitioners are not named in the FIR. The name of the petitioners figured in the case in the confessional statement of co-accused, but nothing has been recovered from the possession of the petitioners. The looted motorcycle was recovered from the possession of Sujit Kumar.

Considering the facts aforesaid, the petitioners above named are directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Aurangabad in connection with Rafiganj P.S. Case No. 10 of 2014.

(Prabhat Kumar Jha, J.) KKSINHA/- U T