Arun Paswan v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.4578 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-68 Year-2020 Thana- SANOKHAR District- Bhagalpur ====================================================== Arun Paswan Son of Niko Paswan Resident of Village- Belsar, P.S.- Amdanda, District- Bhagalpur.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Rajive Ranjan Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Anil Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 02-02-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State through virtual court proceedings. The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 328, 302, 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Earlier prayer for bail of the petitioner was rejected vide order dated 21.10.2021 with liberty to renew his prayer for bail after framing of charge.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that charge has already been framed against the petitioner which is annexed as Annexure-4 of this application.

Considering the fact that charge has already been framed, the above named petitioner, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.4578 of 2022(2) dt.02-02-2022 2/2 pending/successor court in connection with Sanokhar (Amdanda) P.S. Case No. 68 of 2020, subject to the conditions:

(1) that one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner, who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to who he is related with the petitioner. He will also undertake to inform the court if there is any change in the address of the petitioner.

(II) that the petitioner will be well represented on each and every date fixed in the case and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates his bail bonds shall be liable to be cancelled. (III) that the appellant will mark his attendance in the local police station in the first week of every month till conclusion of trial, failing which the prosecution will be at liberty to move cancellation of his bail bond. (IV) that the bailor shall also stated on affidavit that he will inform the Court concerned if the petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the Court below will be at liberty to initiate proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse. (Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) devendra/- U T