← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/21751/2018disposed

Bhuneshwar Singh v. The State Of Bihar And ANR

2020-01-06The Chief Justice -,Mr. Justice Dr. Anil Kumar Upadhyay2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.21751 of 2018 ====================================================== Bhuneshwar Singh, S/o Dev Nandan Singh, P.O.- Maharani, Man Tengrahi, Gopalganj- 841409.

... ... Petitioner

Versus

1.

The State Of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Department of Science and Technology, Govt. of Bihar, Technology Bhawan, Vishweswaraiya Bhawan Campus, Bailey Road, Patna - 8000015.

2.

The Department of Science and Technology, Government of Bihar, Patna through its Principal Secretary, Govt. of Bihar, Technology Bhawan, Vishweswaraiya Bhawan Campus, Bailey Road, Patna - 8000015 ... ... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr. Vagisha Pragya Vacaknavi, Adv.

For the Respondents :

Mr. P.N.Shahi, AAG-6 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) 06-01-2020 The petition filed on 05.11.2018 is listed for hearing for the first time today before the Court.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondents.

Petitioner has prayed for the following reliefs: "(i) For issuance of a writ of certiorari in the nature thereof or any other appropriate writs/orders/directions for quashing order whereby the name of Government Polytechnic, Mantegrahi, (Baikunthpur), Gopalganj has been kept in the name of the 'Braj Kishor Narayan Singh'. The petitioner is not in possession of the copy of the aforesaid order and therefore, the same is not attached herein. The respondents may be directed to produce the same on record for kind perusal by this Hon'ble Court."

Patna High Court CWJC No.21751 of 2018(2) dt.06-01-2020 2/2 After the matter was heard for some time, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner shall be content if a direction is issued to the concerned respondents to consider and decide the representation, which the petitioner shall be making afresh within a period of four weeks from today. Learned counsel for the State states that upon receipt of such request, if any, the same shall be dealt with in accordance with law, expeditiously and positively within a period of three months from the date of receipt thereof. Equally, liberty is reserved to the petitioner to take recourse to such alternative remedies as are otherwise available in accordance with law.

We are hopeful that as and when petitioner takes recourse to such remedies, as are otherwise available in law, before the appropriate forum, the same shall be dealt with, in accordance with law and with reasonable dispatch. The petition stands disposed of in the aforesaid terms. (Sanjay Karol, CJ) ( Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J) P.K.P./- U