← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./5244/2026rejected

Bhulawan Tiwari @ Mansha Tiwari v. The State Of Bihar

2026-02-17Mr. Justice Ramesh Chand Malviya2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.5244 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-375 Year-2025 Thana- GORIAKOTHI District- Siwan ====================================================== Bhulawan Tiwari @ Mansha Tiwari, aged about 19 years, Gender-Male, S/o Rajmangal Tiwari, Resident of Village - Saidpura, P.S - Goriyakothi, District - Siwan ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Aakash Choudhary, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Dharmendra Prasad, Advocate For the Informant :

Mr. Shailesh Kumar, Advocate Mr. Sushil Kumar, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESH CHAND MALVIYA ORAL ORDER 17-02-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(2), 109, 351(2), 352 and 3(5) of the BNS, 2023.

3. The allegation against the petitioner is that he assaulted the informant by means of lathi, danda and rod and during course of fighting, petitioner took out a knife from his pocket and stabbed the informant in the middle of his waist and one Shivshanker Mahto also sustained injury on his left shoulder and both persons were injured.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.5244 of 2026(2) dt.17-02-2026 2/2 petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He next submits that nothing has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner, so his participation in the alleged occurrence is not believable. Petitioner has got clean antecedent as stated in para-3 of the petition.

5. Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner and submits that petitioner has assaulted the informant along with other members and during course of fighting, petitioner took out a knife from his pocket and stabbed the informant in the middle of his waist.

6. On perusal of the first information report, injury report and impugned order dated 16.12.2025, it appears from the injury report that the injury sustained by the injured is incised wound on the left shoulder joint 1"x1/2"x1/2" and, thus, the injury report supports the allegation against the petitioner, so I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. 7.Accordingly, the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is hereby rejected.

(Ramesh Chand Malviya, J) Brajesh Kumar/- U T