Patna High CourtCWJC/4665/2017disposed

Md. Rasid Ansari v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2018-03-22Mr. Justice Dr. Anil Kumar Upadhyay2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.4665 of 2017 ===========================================================

1. Md. Rasid Ansari, Son of Late Noor Mohammad Ansari, Resident of VillageFauladpur, Police Station- Sakurabad, District- Jehanabad. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Education Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

2. The Director, Primary Education, Bihar, Patna.

3. The District Magistrate, Jehanabad.

4. The District Education Officer, Jehanabad.

5. The District Programme Officer, (Establishment), Jehanabad.

6. The Block Education Officer, Ratni Faridpur, District- Jehanabad. .... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Binod Kumar For the Respondent/s : Mr. MADANJEET SINGH- GP20 Mr. Naredra Kumar, A.C. to G.P.20) =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 22-03-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, counsel appearing on behalf of the State.

Vide office order as contained in Memo No.2477 dated 27.11.2017, the District Programme Officer, Jehanabad accepted the joining of the petitioner for the post of teacher. In view of the aforesaid grievance of the petitioner so far as joining is concerned stand redressed. The other grievance, i.e, payment of salary for the period petitioner was not provided adequate security so that he may render service in school in question on account of a dispute of distribution of scholarship and uniform is

Patna High Court CWJC No.4665 of 2017 dt.22-03-2018 2/2 concerned, the respondents are required to consider the case and pass appropriate order for the period the petitioner did not perform the responsibility on account of threat perception and reasoned speaking order may be passed within a maximum period of 60 days from the date of receipt of production of a copy of this order. In case the respondents find that if representation filed by the petitioner has not been disposed of as yet, the same shall be considered and disposed of in accordance with law within the time frame indicated hereinabove. With the aforesaid direction, this writ application is disposed of. (Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J) Sanjeev/- AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE NA Uploading Date Transmission Date