Md. Munsab Baitha @ Munsab v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.6680 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-135 Year-2025 Thana- RUPAULI District- Purnia ====================================================== Md. Munsab Baitha @ Munsab S/o- Late Alim Baitha R/v- Chapahari W.No5, Ps- Rupauli Dist- Purnea ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Kumar Rajdeep, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Anil Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER 30-01-2026 Heard Mr. Kumar Rajdeep, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Mr. Anil Kumar, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.
2. Petitioner seeks bail who is in custody since 30.08.2025 in connection with Rupauli P.S. Case No. 135 of 2025, F.I.R. dated 14.07.2025 for the offences punishable under Sections 108, 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023.
3. According to prosecution case, the informant alleged that the petitioner along with other co-accused persons assaulted his son, namely, Sajib Baitha on 06.06.2025 and after that used to threatened him due to which his son committed suicide.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has clean antecedent and he has falsely been
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.6680 of 2026(2) dt.30-01-2026 2/3 implicated in the present case. He further submits that the allegation as alleged in the F.I.R. is false and fabricated and the petitioners have not committed any offences as alleged in the F.I.R. It has come during investigation that one blue colour diary was seized during investigation which suggest that deceased had committed suicide himself and apart from that FSL report also suggest that deceased had committed suicide himself. He further submits that the police after investigation submitted the charge sheet against the petitioner and the petitioner is in custody since 30.08.2025.
5. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner.
6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Purnea in connection with Rupauli P.S. Case No. 135 of 2025, subject to the following conditions:- i. Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court and shall remain physically present as directed by the court and on his absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.6680 of 2026(2) dt.30-01-2026 3/3 reason, his bail bond shall be cancelled by the Court below. ii. If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.
iii. And further condition that the court below shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in case at any stage it is found that the petitioner has concealed his criminal antecedent, the court below shall take step for cancellation of bail bond of the petitioner. However, the acceptance of bail bonds in terms of the above-mentioned order shall not be delayed for purpose of or in the name of verification.
(Rajesh Kumar Verma, J) Suruchi/- U T