Syed Arif Hussain v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.4284 of 2021 ====================================================== Syed Arif Hussain Son of Md. Mokimuddin Secretary, Dargah Sharif Jalki Waqf No. 2683/ Katihar, Resident of Village- Jalki, P.S.- Azamnagar, DistrictKatihar. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar 2.
The District Magistrate Katihar.
3.
The Senior Superintendent of Police Katihar.
4.
The Sub- Divisional Officer Barsoi, Katihar.
5.
The Sub- Divisional Police Officer Barsoi, Katihar. 6.
The Circle Officer Azamnagar, Katihar.
7.
The Circle Inspector Azamnagar, Katihar.
8.
The Officer Incharge Azamnagar Police Station, Katihar. 9.
The Revenue Staff Azamnagar, Katihar.
10.
The Circle Nazir Azamnagar, Katihar.
11.
The Bihar State Sunni Wakf Board Through its Chief Executive Office, 2nd Floor, Haj Bhawan, Harding Road, Ali Imam Path, Police StationSachivalya, District- Patna. 12.
The Chairman Bihar State Sunni Wakf Board, 2nd Floor, Haj Bhawan, Harding Road, Ali Imam Path, Police Station- Sachivalya, District- Patna. 13.
The Chief Executive Officer Bihar State Sunni Wakf Board, 2nd Floor, Haj Bhawan, Harding Road, Ali Imam Path, Police Station- Sachivalya, DistrictPatna. 14.
Syed Rahat Alam Son of Shafique Resident of Village- Jalki, Police StationAzamnagar, District- Katihar. 15.
S.M. Ali Asgar Son of Abdul Hasmat Resident of Village- Jalki, Police Station- Azamnagar, District- Katihar.
... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
NONE For the State :
Mr. Mukul Prasad, AC to GP 18 For Res. Nos. 14 & 15 :
Mr. Rashid Izhar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 04-09-2021 No one appears on behalf of the petitioner to press this writ application. However, learned Counsel for the State
Patna High Court CWJC No.4284 of 2021(3) dt.04-09-2021 2/2 and learned Counsel for the respondent nos. 14 and 15 are present.
On the last occasion also, no one had appeared on behalf of the petitioner to press this writ application. Accordingly, this writ application is dismissed for default.
(Anil Kumar Sinha, J.) Prabhakar Anand/- U √