Manish Kumar @ Dr. Manish Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.10933 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-301 Year-2023 Thana- CHHAURADANO District- East Champaran ====================================================== MANISH KUMAR @ DR. MANISH KUMAR SON OF SHAILENDRA KUMAR SINGH RESIDENT OF VILLAGE - KHAIRWA BAZAR, P.S. - CHAURADANO, DISTRICT - EAST CHAMPARAN ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
THE STATE OF BIHAR 2.
The State Of Bihar The advocate general bihar patna ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Prateek Tandon For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Binod Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 06-03-2024
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.
2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 420, 467, 468, 471 and 308 of the Indian Penal Code.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is a person with clean antecedent.
4. The informant alleges that on direction of its superior, the clinic of the petitioner, Rajnish Seva Sadan, was raided and the documents were asked for, but the same was not provided.
5. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.10933 of 2024(2) dt.06-03-2024 2/3 petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case, it is next submitted that petitioner is a village practitioner and for the said submission relies on Annexure-2 to the anticipatory bail application. It is further submitted that no patient has made any complaints against the petitioner of any mala fide practice. It is further submitted that since petitioner is a village practitioner, as such, he had opened a small clinic but then it is true that it was not registered in terms of the Clinical Establishment Act. It is next submitted that petitioner in future would be careful and in the event if he intends to open a clinic, he will seek all requisite permission.
6. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.
7. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned trial court within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Chauradano P.S. Case No. 301 of 2023 subject to the conditions as laid down
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.10933 of 2024(2) dt.06-03-2024 3/3 under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.
(Satyavrat Verma, J) Rishabh/- U T