Patna High CourtCR. MISC./20195/2015bail granted

Anmol Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2015-06-17Mr. Justice Shivaji Pandey2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.20195 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -223 Year- 2014 Thana -SONBERSA District- SAHARSA ======================================================

1. Anmol Kumar son of Umesh Yadav resident of village - Matha, P.S. - Salkhua, District - Saharsa.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Anil Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Pradip Narayan Kumar(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL ORDER 17-06-2015 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offences under Sections 392 of the Indian Penal Code. It has been alleged that on 10.11.2014 some miscreants committed road robbery and later on the police on basis of mobile set raided the house of the petitioner. From the possession of the petitioner a looted mobile including motor cycle was recovered. In the order sheet it has been mentioned that the aforesaid mobile and motor cycle was brought by his brother-in-law, namely, Guddu Yadav who has fled away leaving behind the mobile and motor cycle.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.20195 of 2015 (2) dt.17-06-2015 petitioner has nothing to do with the aforesaid mobile and motor cycle. Petitioner is in jail since 7.12.2014. Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case, let petitioner, Anmol Kumar, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Saharsa in Sonbarsa Raj (Kashnagar O.P.) P.S. Case No.223 of 2014, subject to the conditions that (i) one of the bailors shall be a close relative of the petitioner (ii) If the petitioner is found involved in future in similar type of case the prosecution will be at liberty to make prayer for cancellation of his bail and the court below will pass necessary order including cancellation of bail and (iii) petitioner would participate in the court proceeding and in the event of being absent on two consecutive dates, the court below will be at liberty to cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner.

(Shivaji Pandey, J) Vinay/- U T