Pradeep Kumar @ Pradeep Mahto v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.14355 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-95 Year-2019 Thana- MAHILA P.S. District- Madhubani ====================================================== 1.
Pradeep Kumar @ Pradeep Mahto, aged about 21 years, Son of Mahavir Mahto.
2.
Mahavir Mahto, aged about 49 years, Son of Panchu Mahto. Both are resident of Village- Pandaul, West Tole, P.S.- Pandaul, DistrictMadhubani. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar.
2.
Sikandar Mahto, Son of Kishori Mahto, resident of Village and P.S.- Deodha, District- Madhubani.
... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Ms. Leelawati Kumari, Adv.
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR ORAL ORDER 25-02-2022 Heard the counsel for the parties.
The petitioners seek bail in anticipation of their arrest in connection with Mahila P.S. Case No. 95 of 2019, dated 14.11.2019, instituted for the offences under Sections 420, 406 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.14355 of 2021(2) dt.25-02-2022 2/3 The marriage of the daughter of the informant was fixed to be solemnized with petitioner No. 1. However, because of the non-payment of additional demand of dowry, the marriage ceremony was forestalled The counsel for the petitioners has submitted that, in fact, they have incurred lot of expenses as every preparation had been made for the purposes of marriage. Later, the bride herself refused to marry the petitioner No.
1. The daughter of the informant is now married to somewhere else. It has further been submitted that the accusation levelled against the petitioners is absolutely false. Regard being had to the facts afore-stated, the petitioners, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of four weeks, are directed to be released on bail on their furnishing bail-bonds in the sum of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Madhubani in connection with Mahila P.S. Case No. 95 of 2019, subject to the conditions laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.14355 of 2021(2) dt.25-02-2022 3/3 The application stands allowed.
(Ashutosh Kumar, J) Praveen-II/- U T