← Library
Patna High CourtC.Misc./1761/2018dismissed

Rajo Devi v. Soni Tanti @ Sunil Tanti And ORS

2024-06-24Mr. Justice Arun Kumar Jha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS JURISDICTION No.1761 of 2018 ====================================================== Rajo Devi Wife of Damodar Tanti, Resident of Village Jagatpur, P.S.- Lodipur, District- Bhagalpur.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

Soni Tanti @ Sunil Tanti, Son of Late Shivcharan Tanti. 2.

Manoj Tanti, Son of Late Shivcharan Tanti, Both residents of Village Jagatpur, P.S.- Lodipur, District- Bhagalpur. 3.

Chinta Devi, Wife of Tanik Tanti, resident of Village- Nasratkhani, P.S.- Nathnagar, District- Bhagalpur.

4.

Sukho Devi, W/o Ganesh Tanti, Resident of Village Maheshamunda, P.S. Kahalgaon, District- Bhagalpur.

5.

Markhi Devi, Wife of Sanjay Tanti, resident of Village- Kanjhia, P.S.- Nathnagar, District- Bhagalpur.

6.

Damodar Tanti, Son of Late Puran Tanti, resident of Village- Jagatpur, P.S.- Lodipur, District- Bhagalpur.

7.

Shanti Devi, Wife of Late Chandra Tanti, Resident of Village Sri Rampur, P.S.- Nathnagar, District- Bhagalpur.

8.

Kamani Devi, Wife of Late Sundar, Resident of Mohalla- Nasratkhani, P.S.- Nathnagar, District- Bhagalpur.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Dr. Manoj Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Bishwa Nath Chaudhary, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR JHA ORAL ORDER 24-06-2024 On 22.04.2024, the following order was passed : "Present learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned counsel for respondent nos. 1 and 2.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner is directed to file jointness affidavit on behalf of respondent nos. 3 and 6 to the recipient of notices on their behalf within four weeks. Learned counsel for the petitioner is further

Patna High Court C.Misc. No.1761 of 2018(6) dt.24-06-2024 2/2 directed to file a substitution petition for deceased respondent no.7 also within four weeks. Learned counsel for the petitioner is also directed to take steps for fresh service of notice upon respondent nos. 5 and 8 also within four weeks, failing which the petition would be dismissed.

3. List this case on 24.06.2024".

2. Office has reported that no substitution petition has been filed.

3. Under the circumstances, this petition stands dismissed for non-compliance of the order dated 22.04.2024. (Arun Kumar Jha, J) V.K.Pandey/- U