Basuki Pandey @ Amit Pandey v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.457 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-652 Year-2018 Thana- SAHARSA District- Saharsa ====================================================== Basuki Pandey @ Amit Pandey, s/o Naresh Pandey r/Village- Bherdhari, P.S.- Saharsa, Distt.- Saharsa.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Satish Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Sri Sanjay Kumar Tiwary 1 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 08-03-2019 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State.
The petitioner seeks bail in Saharsa Sadar P.S. Case No. 652/2018, instituted for offence under Section(s) 414 of the Indian Penal Code read with Section 25(1-b)a and 26 of Arms Act.
It is alleged in the written report one loaded country made pistol and five live cartridges have been recovered from possession of this petitioner.
Learned Addl. P.P. has submitted that 15 other cases are pending against this petitioner.
Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is on bail in all those cases.
Petitioner is in custody since 01.06.2018.
Keeping in view the period of custody, prayer of the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.457 of 2019(3) dt.08-03-2019 2/2 petitioner for grant of bail is allowed. Let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Saharsa, in connection with Saharsa Sadar P.S. Case No. 652/2018, subject to the conditions that (I) both the bailors shall be the close relative of the petitioner.
(II) Petitioner shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and absence on two consecutive dates without valid reason will result in cancellation of bail bond of the petitioner and (III) if petitioner tamper with the evidence in the case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail bond of the petitioner.
(Sanjay Priya, J) rakhi/- U T