Patna High CourtCR. MISC./4495/2015bail granted

Ehteshamul Haque v. The State Of Bihar

2015-04-28Mr. Justice Hemant Kumar Srivastava2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.4495 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -663 Year- 2014 Thana -KOTWALI District- PATNA ======================================================

1. Ehteshamul Haque S/O Late Enamul Haque Resident of Chauk Bazar,P.S-Motihari Town,Distt.-East Champaran at Motihari .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ravi Shanker Pankaj For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Rajendra Singh Shastrijee(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT KUMAR SRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 28-04-2015 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

The petitioner is not named in the first information report but in course of investigation, the name of this petitioner surfaced in this case as the Account No. 3038305872 was stood in the name of brother of the petitioner and the petitioner was located in CC TV footage of the concerned bank. The petitioner carries criminal antecedent of several cases but submission on behalf of the petitioner is that the petitioner has been implicated in this case on mere suspicion as neither the account No. nor the mobile phone stood in the name of the petitioner and moreover, the petitioner is in jail since 03-01-2014 in a case, which is triable by the Magistrate.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.4495 of 2015 (4) dt.28-04-2015 2/2 Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances as well as submission of the parties, let the petitioner named above, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each in connection with Kotwali P.S. Case No. 663 of 2014 to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Patna subject to condition that one of the sureties must be close relative of the petitioner and the petitioner shall attend the trial court, in person, on each and every date for the period of 9 months or till conclusion of his trial, whichever is earlier and if, he fails to do so, on two consecutive dates without any reasonable cause, the learned trial court shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner.

(Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J) A.K.V./- U T