Amarjeet Kumar @ Amarjeet Yadav v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.4254 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-382 Year-2024 Thana- BAHERA District- Darbhanga ====================================================== Amarjeet Kumar @ Amarjeet Yadav S/o Ram Prakash Yadav Resident of village - Trimuhani Ward No. 13, PS - Bahera, Distt.- Darbhanga ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Ms. Archna Aanand, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Md. Ataur Rahman, A.P.P.
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 28-04-2026
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.
2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 351(2), 352, 132, 121(1), 121(2), 74, 109, 125(b) and 191(2) of the B.N.S., 2023.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has antecedent of one case and the informant alleges that one Ranjit was apprehended in a case of liquor but the crowd gathered and attacked the police force with lathi, danda, stone, bamboo etc. and even misbehaved with Puja, who was videographing the occurrence, thereafter, the accused persons snatched the seized liquor from the Constable, namely, Chandan and also took out the liquor from the dickey of the motorcycle and freed Ranjit.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has been falsely implicated in the instant case by the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.4254 of 2026(2) dt.28-04-2026 2/2 informant. It is further submitted that from perusal of the allegation as alleged in the FIR, it would manifest that the date of occurrence is 06.10.2024 and the FIR came to be instituted on 08.10.2024, i.e., after a delay of two days. It is next submitted that since petitioner stays nearby to the place of occurrence, as such, he came to be implicated. It is also submitted that no specific allegation of assault is alleged against the petitioner.
5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.
6. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, the petitioner, abovenamed, in the event of his arrest or surrender within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court where the case is pending/Successor Court in connection with Bahera P.S. Casse No.382 of 2024, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C./482(2) of the B.N.S.S. (Satyavrat Verma, J) Kundan/- U T