← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./12433/2016bail granted

Shourav Kumar @ Saurav Kumar Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

2016-05-04Mr. Justice Jitendra Mohan Sharma3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.12433 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -1026 Year- 2015 Thana -SAHARSA District- SAHARSA ======================================================

1. Shourav Kumar @ Saurav Kumar Yadav S/o Abhinandan Yadav, Resident of Village- Sakra Paharpur, P.S.- Simri Bakhtiyarpur (Balwahat O.P.). District- Saharsa.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Nafisuzzoha For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Tarun Pd.Mandal(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER 04-05-2016 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. representing the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Saharsa Sadar P.S. Case No. 1026 of 2015 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 363 and 365 of the Indian Penal Code.

Allegedly, Saurav Kumar aged 8 years was kidnapped from Mithila Public School by the petitioner. During investigation, the petitioner was apprehended by the informant and others and accordingly, the police arrested him and on the basis of disclosure made by the petitioner, the victim boy was recovered from the premises of Sitaram Academy.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.12433 of 2016 (3) dt.04-05-2016 2/3 Submission is of false implication and that due to enmity, the petitioner has been implicated in this case, as a matter of fact, it is not a case of kidnapping rather only with a view to harass the informant, the victim boy was taken away, the petitioner neither has demanded any ransom nor there was any bad intention on his part. The statement of the victim boy has also been recorded under Section 164 of the Code of Criminal Procedure wherein he has not stated regarding any illtreatment done by the petitioner. The learned A.P.P. opposes the prayer of bail by submitting that on the basis of disclosure made by the petitioner, the victim boy was recovered.

In the facts and circumstances stated above, the petitioner, above named, shall be released on bail after completion of six months in custody from date of his remand on execution of bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Saharsa in connection with Saharsa Sadar P.S. Case No. 1026 of 2015, subject to the conditions that one of the bailors must be near relative and another having sufficient immovable property within the territorial jurisdiction of the court concerned and the petitioner

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.12433 of 2016 (3) dt.04-05-2016 3/3 shall remain present on each and every date during trial and the default on two consecutive dates on his part without any reason shall disentitle the petitioner from privilege of bail. (Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J) ajaypd./- U T