Parduman Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.1031 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-44 Year-2018 Thana- JAYRAMPUR District- Sheikhpura * ====================================================== Parduman Kumar Umesh Yadav Resident of Village-Teus, P.S.-Jairampur, Dist.-Sheikhpura ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Bipin Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Sri Dashrath Mehta ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 27-03-2019 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in Jairampur P.S. Case No. 44/2018, instituted for offences under Section(s) 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 307, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code read with Section 27 of Arms Act.

It is alleged in the written report that on the date of occurrence informant had gone to Sun Temple with some boys. In the mean time, petitioner along with other accused persons surrounded the informant and started abusing him. They brutally assaulted the informant with lathi and Farsa on account of which he fell down. Thereafter petitioner made two firing from his pistol causing injury on the chest of informant. He was taken to hospital for treatment.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.1031 of 2019(3) dt.27-03-2019 2/2 Injury report is available in case diary, from which it appears that informant has received lacerated wound with inverted margin and charring with fresh bleeding. Opinion is kept reserved.

Learned counsel for the informant has submitted that there is direct allegation against the petitioner of causing firearm injury on the chest of informant.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner at this stage. Accordingly, prayer of the petitioner for grant of bail is rejected.

The trial court is directed to expedite the trial and make efforts to conclude the same within nine months from the date of receipt of this order.

Petitioner is given liberty to renew the prayer for bail after nine months in the event no substantive progress is made in trial.

(Sanjay Priya, J) rakhi/- U T