Shipu Yadav @ Shampoo Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.3774 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-50 Year-2021 Thana- ATRI District- Gaya ====================================================== Shipu Yadav @ Shampoo Yadav, son of Munshi Yadav, R/O VillageIbrahimpur, P.S.- Khizersarai, District- Gaya ... ... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Syed Asgher Najmi, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Ms. Veena Rani Prasad, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 21-02-2022 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to remove defect(s), as pointed out by the office, if any, within a period of four weeks from today.

This application for grant of anticipatory bail arises out of Atri P.S. Case No. 50 of 2021 registered for the offence under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 325, 307, 332, 333, 353, 427, 272 and 273 of the Indian Penal Code and under Sections 30(a)(d) of the Bihar Prohibition & Excise Act. In view of the fact that prima facie a case under the Excise Act, is made out against the petitioner, this application for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner is not maintainable in view of Full Bench decision of this Court rendered in the case of Ram Vinay Yadav vs. The State of Bihar reported in 2019(2) P.L.J.R. 1089 (F.B.).

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.3774 of 2022(2) dt.21-02-2022 2/2 Accordingly, this anticipatory bail application is dismissed as not maintainable.

(Sandeep Kumar, J) pawan/- U T